The jury in a South Carolina police officer’s murder trial is unable to reach a verdict 14 hours into deliberation

Michael Slager walter scott

The South Carolina jury tasked with deciding the fate of a former police officer charged with murder is at a standstill after more than 14 hours of deliberation, prompting the judge to urge them to reach consensus.

Michael Slager, the North Charleston patrolman who was filmed in 2015 shooting at unarmed black motorist Walter Scott eight times as he ran away, is facing life in prison if he is convicted of murder.

The jury is also considering a manslaughter charge, which carries a maximum sentence of 30 years.

But there is no indication a verdict will be reached anytime soon, if it’s reached at all. At various times over the three days of deliberation, the jury requested transcripts of testimony from some of the 55 witnesses who spoke during the monthlong trial.

On Thursday, Judge Clifton Newman announced the jury had written a note asking about “the difference between fear and passion,” ostensibly referring to the different criteria for murder and manslaughter.

Newman declined to provide the jurors an answer, saying, “This is a matter solely for you to determine.”

The jurors — 11 of whom are white and one of whom is black — must reach a unanimous decision.

walter scottOn Friday, after jurors reported their standstill, Newman invited them into the courtroom and warned them of the consequences of failing to reach a verdict, which would result in a mistrial.

“In that case, it does not mean that anybody wins. It just means that at some future time, I will try this case with some other jury sitting where you now sit,” Newman told the jurors.

“The same participants will come, and the same lawyers will likely ask basically the same questions and get basically the same answers, and we will go through this whole process again,” he continued. “There is no reason for me to suppose that the case will ever be submitted to 12 more intelligent, conscientious and competent jurors than you, or that more clearer evidence will be produced on one side than the other.”

“I therefore ask that you return to your deliberations, if you will.”

The trial hinges on whether the jury believes Slager, who is white, could reasonably think he was in life-threatening danger during his interaction with Scott. Slager testified that Scott, after fleeing a routine traffic stop, had wrestled Slager’s Taser away from him and lunged at the officer. However, that account is denied by Feidin Santana, a bystander who filmed part of the incident.

SEE ALSO: The murder trial of a South Carolina police officer who shot an unarmed black man has 11 white jurors

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch a man’s dramatic escape from a raging wildfire in Tennessee

The jury in a South Carolina police officer’s murder trial is unable to reach a verdict 14 hours into deliberation syndicated from https://lawpallc.wordpress.com

Advertisements

Author: Tristan Fox

I love to spend my weekends roaming around my neighborhood with my bike. I am into promoting online websites related to lawsuits, law tips and lawfirms. In this way I am aiding them in pushing their contents in gaining more leverage for the power of internet for local lawfirms in and around my area.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s