Trump’s immigration ban has taken another big blow in court

donald trump steve mnuchin

A federal judge in Virginia shot down President Donald Trump’s controversial travel ban on Monday.

Judge Leonie M. Brinkema ruled that the executive order temporarily barring people from seven majority-Muslim countries likely violates the First Amendment’s protection to freedom of religion.

“Just as the Supreme Court has held that ‘the world is not made brand new every morning,’ a person is not made brand new simply by taking the oath of office,” Brinkema wrote in her ruling.

“The ‘Muslim ban’ was a centerpiece of the president’s campaign for months, and the press release calling for it was still available on his website as of the day this Memorandum Opinion is being entered.”

Brinkema was referring to a statement on Trump’s campaign website from December 7, 2015 “calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.”

Brinkema’s ruling, which only applies to the commonwealth of Virginia, follows the Ninth Circuit federal appeals court’s ruling on Thursday against reinstating the order. The Trump administration has said it will appeal the federal ruling and possibly issue a new order.

Brinkema said that the Trump administration didn’t produce a “scintilla of evidence” to justify the ban.

“Maximum power does not mean absolute power,” she wrote. “Every presidential action must still comply with the limits set by Congress’ delegation of power and the constraints of the Constitution, including the Bill of Rights.”

Brinkema referenced interviews the president gave before he was a candidate and after he won the election, saying Christians from Muslim countries were going to be given priority entry into the US, and declaring that “there is a Muslim problem” in the United States.

Brinkema also cited statements made by former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani on Fox News in January. Giuliani, who advised the Trump campaign, said Trump called him and asked how to carry out a “Muslim ban” “legally.”

“Defendants have not denied any of these statements or produced any evidence, beyond the text of the EO itself, to support their contention that the EO was primarily motivated by national security concerns,” Brinkema wrote in her opinion.

Brinkema also ruled that the order was “disruptive to the operation of [Virginia’s] public colleges and universities,” resulting in reduced revenue, causing “‘anxiety, confusion, and distress'” among university personnel, and “inflaming ‘anti-American sentiment'” abroad.

 

Here’s the statement on Trump’s campaign website:

Donald_J__Trump_Statement_on_Preventing_Muslim_Immigration___Donald_J_Trump_for_President

 

SEE ALSO: Trump may have undermined the legal case for his immigration ban in 2 major ways

DON’T MISS: Trump has already signed 25 executive actions — here’s what each one does

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: ‘There have been times where we have differed’: Trudeau reacts to Trump’s travel ban during a joint conference

Trump’s immigration ban has taken another big blow in court syndicated from https://lawpallc.wordpress.com

Advertisements

Author: Tristan Fox

I love to spend my weekends roaming around my neighborhood with my bike. I am into promoting online websites related to lawsuits, law tips and lawfirms. In this way I am aiding them in pushing their contents in gaining more leverage for the power of internet for local lawfirms in and around my area.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s