States are lining up to challenge Trump’s revised travel ban before it takes effect

california attorney general xavier becerra

California on Monday became the most recent state to join a legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s revised executive order restricting travel from six majority-Muslim countries.

Trump’s order is set to take effect March 16, unless a judge first grants a restraining order.

The revised ban blocks new visas from being issued to people from Iran, Syria, Somalia, Sudan, Libya, and Yemen, and suspends all refugee admissions for 120 days.

A legal brief filed by California argues that the state’s residents — including its more than 10 million immigrants and 150,000 international students — will be harmed by the new ban, according to the Los Angeles TimesThe brief also alleged the state will suffer financial harm, as visitors from the Middle East spent $681 million in the state in 2015, generating $40.8 million in sales tax revenue.

“The Trump Administration may have changed the text of the now-discredited Muslim travel ban, but they didn’t change its unconstitutional intent and effect,” California’s attorney general Xavier Becerra told media on Monday.

“It’s still an attack on people — women and children, professors and business colleagues, seniors and civic leaders — based on their religion and national origin.”

Hawaii was the first to file a lawsuit last Wednesday, followed by Washington state — which had been the first state to challenge Trump’s original ban in January. Washington’s renewed lawsuit has been joined by Oregon, Minnesota, Maryland, New York, and California, and attorneys general in Massachusetts have also said they plan to join.

New York’s amended complaint was also released to the public on Monday, alleging that its residents, universities, and businesses will suffer harm, as the state is home to more than 4.4 million foreign-born residents, including 13,000 from the six countries named in the revised ban.

Trump administration officials have defended both bans as necessary in preventing the entry of travelers from countries affected by terrorism, until more rigorous vetting procedures can be implemented.

Washington’s challenge alleges that Trump’s revised order is similar both in procedure and in intent as the previous ban, and on Monday filed a motion asking for last month’s emergency halt on the original ban to be applied to the revised one.

Hawaii’s lawsuit, which is separate from Washington’s, also challenges the ban’s constitutionality, and argues that it will harm the state’s Muslim residents and foreign students, and damage its tourism-based economy.

On Monday, the federal government disputed Hawaii’s claims as speculation, according to the Associated Press. A federal judge will hear arguments on Wednesday.

SEE ALSO: Hawaii was the first state to challenge Trump’s new travel ban — here’s why it says the order is still unconstitutional

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: People on Twitter are mocking Trump’s claim that his administration is a ‘fined-tuned machine’

States are lining up to challenge Trump’s revised travel ban before it takes effect syndicated from https://lawpallc.wordpress.com

Advertisements

Author: Tristan Fox

I love to spend my weekends roaming around my neighborhood with my bike. I am into promoting online websites related to lawsuits, law tips and lawfirms. In this way I am aiding them in pushing their contents in gaining more leverage for the power of internet for local lawfirms in and around my area.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s