Trump didn’t need approval from Congress to strike Syria

US President Donald Trump arrives to deliver a statement about missile strikes on a Syrian airfield, at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, on April 6, 2017.

Lawmakers slammed President Donald Trump for not seeking congressional approval before his strike on Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s military infrastructure on Thursday night, and while he could use their support — he didn’t need it.

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., called the move an “ill-thought out military action” that “exposes the immoral hypocrisy of this administration’s policy in the Middle East,” in a statement.

In 2011 former President Barack Obama did not seek Congress’ approval to carry out a strike on Libya’s Mummar Qaddafi.

Later, in 2016, Obama did not seek Congress’ approval to strike Houthi-controlled radar sites in Yemen after the Houthis had targeted US Navy ships with anti-ship guided missiles.

“The law as to declaration of war is very clear in the constitution,” Lawrence Brennan, a former US Navy captain and expert on maritime law, told Business Insider. “Having said that,” he added, the constitutional law on declaring war “has not been followed since World War II.”

The War Powers Resolution, passed in 1973 over then-President Richard Nixon’s veto, enshrined Congress’ right to approve or reject military action that lasts longer than 60 days. For now, the Trump administration has given every indication that the strike was limited, and a one-off.

Speaking about the cruise missile strike at a briefing late on Thursday, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson said “I would not in any way attempt to extrapolate that [the strike] to a change in our policy or posture relative to our military activities in Syria today. There has been no change in that status.”

U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer USS Porter (DDG 78) conducts strike operations while in the Mediterranean Sea which U.S. Defense Department said was a part of cruise missile strike against Syria on April 7, 2017.

However, “at the end of the game, Congress controls the budget. They can do what Congress did with Ford at the end of the Vietnam war — cut off the funding,” said Brennan.

So while Trump acted within the legal and practical norms of the presidency with his unilateral strike on Syria, congressional authorization for limited strikes is “lawfully not required, but practically, often a good thing,” according to Brennan.

Syria strike map

SEE ALSO: Russia just suspended key military agreements with the US — raising the risk of war

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 7 things the CIA looks for when recruiting people

Trump didn’t need approval from Congress to strike Syria syndicated from https://lawpallc.wordpress.com

Advertisements

Author: Tristan Fox

I love to spend my weekends roaming around my neighborhood with my bike. I am into promoting online websites related to lawsuits, law tips and lawfirms. In this way I am aiding them in pushing their contents in gaining more leverage for the power of internet for local lawfirms in and around my area.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s